PG361.84 −0.51%BRK.B888.57 +2.03%SO306.79 +0.49%PG361.84 −0.51%BRK.B888.57 +2.03%SO306.79 +0.49%
Forager Fox — Signature move
Legend Terminal · Fox

Forager Fox

A collectible critter in the spirit of Peter Lynch · 1977–1990

POWEROrdinary observation plus homework surfaces growth before Wall Street notices.
legendaryFactor styleFox
Total return
+3.9%
Simulated, this window (~1 month). Never annualized.
vs SPY
+2.2%
Window spread over the S&P 500 benchmark.
Max drawdown
−2.7%
Worst peak-to-valley dip realized in-window.
Sharpe
3.92
Return per unit of risk (annualized ratio).
Simulated · educational · not investment advice. A book traded in Forager Fox's style — a fictional critter in the spirit of Peter Lynch. Not a portrait, quote, endorsement, or Peter Lynch's real returns.
The story

A critter in the spirit of Peter Lynch, who ran Fidelity's Magellan Fund to roughly 29% annualized returns over 13 years and wrote 'One Up on Wall Street.' Inspired by his ground-level curiosity and knack for spotting growing businesses in daily life. Educational inspiration only.

The lesson
What a player learnsUnderstand what a company actually does before you own it.
Strategy dossier — Value InvestingFactor · medium risk

Buy assets trading below your estimate of their intrinsic worth, and wait.

Value investing buys assets that look cheap relative to fundamentals: earnings, cash flow, book value, or assets. The premise, rooted in Graham and Dodd, is that markets over-punish out-of-favor companies, creating a 'margin of safety' between price and intrinsic value that eventually closes. Investors do bottom-up analysis of balance sheets and business quality, then hold patiently for the market to re-rate the stock. It is inherently contrarian, requiring you to buy what others are selling. As a factor, cheapness is measured with ratios and applied across a diversified basket rather than a single deep-dive, but the underlying bet is the same.

Strengths

  • Long, well-documented historical premium over decades
  • Margin of safety cushions downside
  • Forces disciplined, fundamentals-based thinking

Trade-offs

  • 'Value traps': cheap stocks that stay cheap or go bankrupt
  • Can underperform growth for a decade-plus (e.g. 2010s)
  • Requires painful patience and contrarian conviction
Also practiced byBenjamin GrahamWarren BuffettSeth KlarmanJoel Greenblatt
SIM · Track record — equity curverebased · 100
100.0101.0102.0103.0104.0105.02026-06-182026-06-192026-06-222026-06-232026-06-242026-06-252026-06-262026-06-292026-06-302026-07-012026-07-022026-07-032026-07-062026-07-072026-07-082026-07-092026-07-102026-07-132026-07-142026-07-152026-07-16
A simulated book traded in Forager Fox's style over the season window (2026-06-182026-07-17, ~21 sessions) vs SPY. Values rebased to 100 — NOT Peter Lynch's real returns.
SIM · Risk · ratios
3.92SHARPE
Sortino
5.87
Reward per unit of downside risk (annualized).
Ann. vol
12%
How bouncy the ride was, annualized.
Win rate
70%
Share of days that finished green.
Portfolio β
0.61
How much it moves with the whole market.
Best day
+1.3%
Biggest single-day gain this window.
Worst day
−1.6%
Biggest single-day drop this window.
Drawdown (in-window)
Returns are raw window totals; ratios are annualized (labelled). SPY did +1.7% over the same window.
SIM · Holdings — real companies, honestly explained3 names
TickerCompanyWeightWindowPath
PG
Procter & Gamble
Everyday brands: Tide, Pampers, Gillette, Crest.
43%
+1.5%
BRK.B
Berkshire Hathaway
Berkshire Hathaway helps money move, grow, and stay safe.
37%
+10.3%
SO
Southern Company
Southern Company provides the steady power and water we rely on.
20%
+1.9%
Tickers are real large-caps used for familiarity — no valuation claims, no price targets.
SIM · Sector exposure
Consumer
43%
Financials
37%
Utilities
20%
SIM · Conviction map — beta × volatility
5%25%45%0.3β0.9β1.6βvol ↑market beta →PGBRK.BSO
Where this critter's simulated picks sit on the risk map — bubble size = portfolio weight, hue = sector.
SIM · Best & worst holder (this window)
BRK.B
Berkshire Hathaway
+10.3%
▲ Best-performing holding
A price-path fact this window — not a verdict on the company.
PG
Procter & Gamble
+1.5%
▼ Worst-performing holding
A price-path fact this window — not a verdict on the company.
Analyst's note
Hedgie
League analyst

🦊 Forager Fox ran a factor style book this window. It returned +3.9% (+2.2% vs SPY), with a Sharpe of 3.92 and a -2.7% worst dip. True to its discipline, it blended its factors and stayed diversified. Discipline over drama — this describes the critter's process and result, not the merit of any company. Simulated · educational · not investment advice.

Model sheet4 poses
Forager Fox — Signature move
Signature moveTheir power in action

Recruit the Forager Fox style in Conviction League

Draft a critter that trades in this spirit, train it on a simulated market, and climb the leaderboard — free and fully simulated, so there's zero real-money risk.

Prices are simulated by a factor model; tickers are real large-caps used for familiarity only. Returns shown are raw window totals over a ~1-month fixture; Sharpe/Sortino/vol are annualized ratios.